IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v81y2024ics0969698924003175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Premium pricing and capacity rationing for advance selling with consumers regret

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Chengyuan
  • Zhang, Bin
  • Yang, Hui

Abstract

Retailers of iconic products commonly implement premium advance selling, which typically triggers regret in consumers. A premium advance selling strategy is centered around differences in pricing and capacity rationing between two selling periods. We develop a decision-theoretic model to capture the key dynamics of a retailer and a unit mass of consumers. We analyze the retailer's decisions on premium pricing and capacity rationing both separately and jointly. We characterize the retailer's strategy equilibrium under certain market conditions and investigate the effect of consumers anticipated regret on the outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of the relative strength of regret and the difference between premium and spot pricing when a retailer adopts premium advance selling. Our analysis further identifies the forces driving a retailer's use of disparate selling strategies. We contribute to the field by offering tangible insights into whether and how premium advance selling should be adopted to help retailers more proactively leverage or mitigate consumers' regret.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Chengyuan & Zhang, Bin & Yang, Hui, 2024. "Premium pricing and capacity rationing for advance selling with consumers regret," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924003175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924003175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.