IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v9y1981i2p177-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing uncertain ventures using experts' judgments in the form of subjective probabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Mancini, Louis
  • Meisner, Jan
  • Singer, Emanuel

Abstract

The paper deals with a procedure known as ASPRO which has been successfull applied at Shell Oil Company. Section II addresses general problems encountered in using subjective assessment procedures. Section III introduces ASPRO's decomposition process which is designed to alleviate some of the problems. The decomposition process produces a questionnaire, the answers to which are the inputs to the ASPRO assessment procedure. Examples of the questionnaire for assessing political risks to oil investment ventures and analyzing new product sectors are given. Section IV explains how the respondents assess the component parts, and Section V outlines the mechanical procedures which are used to combine the assessments. Examples of how ASPRO's output can be used to communicate the respondents' quantified judgments are given in Section VI. Conclusions are in Section VII.

Suggested Citation

  • Mancini, Louis & Meisner, Jan & Singer, Emanuel, 1981. "Assessing uncertain ventures using experts' judgments in the form of subjective probabilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 177-187.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:9:y:1981:i:2:p:177-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(81)90019-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:9:y:1981:i:2:p:177-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.