IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v4y1976i4p463-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job shop scheduling--A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Randolph, Paul H

Abstract

A missile range is essentially a large-scale job-shop, involving prodigious amounts of test equipment and formidable problems of coordination. Because of its characteristics, a missile range can be considered a one-machine, N-job situation. For this problem the major scheduling methods were examined and tested, but all were discarded as unfeasible except one which used a Monte Carlo scheduling procedure adjoined with statistical stopping rules. An algorithm based on these ideas was constructed, and it has proven to be flexible and workable, providing predictably near optimum schedules for the missile range within a probabilistic and statistical framework. Even though there is not total implementation yet, considerable benefits to the missile range have already been experienced. For example, in order to automate the scheduling process, it was necessary to codify the goals of the range, something that had never been formalized before. This involved an unprecedented scrutiny and precision of definition of these goals, and from this study a reasonable numerical optimization criterion was constructed. Also, in order to use any automated scheduling algorithm, data files had to be stored on tape for ready access, which in turn has improved other operations on the missile range that were dependent on these data. Furthermore, the scheduling algorithm is providing conflict-free schedules in a few minutes of computer time.

Suggested Citation

  • Randolph, Paul H, 1976. "Job shop scheduling--A case study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 463-477.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:463-477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(76)90119-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:463-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.