IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v28y2000i2p247-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A role for content analysis in research on MS/OR research literature

Author

Listed:
  • Reisman, Arnold
  • Kirschnick, Frank A.

Abstract

This is a rejoinder to the debate regarding both the utility of and the approaches to meta-research on OR/MS research publications. This debate was initiated by the publication in Omega of a paper by Ormerod (Omega 1997;25:599-603). That paper expanded the methodology proposed by Reisman and Kirschnick (Opns Res 1994;42:577-588 and 1995;43:731-740) and extended its application geographically so as to include the flagship OR/MS, Europe-based, journals.

Suggested Citation

  • Reisman, Arnold & Kirschnick, Frank A., 2000. "A role for content analysis in research on MS/OR research literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 247-248, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:28:y:2000:i:2:p:247-248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(99)00047-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vastag, Gyula & Montabon, Frank, 2002. "Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 109-126, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:28:y:2000:i:2:p:247-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.