IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v27y1999i2p167-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic workplace monitoring: What employees think

Author

Listed:
  • Oz, Effy
  • Glass, Richard
  • Behling, Robert

Abstract

It is estimated that at least 26 million Americans are electronically monitored in the workplace. Management insists that they have the right to monitor workers during time paid for by the company. Labor leaders and civil rights advocates argue that the practice violates the dignity and right to privacy of employees. In this study, 823 employees were surveyed. A great majority of the respondents felt that electronic monitoring might cause undesirable tension between managers and workers. Supervisors favor electronic monitoring more than non-supervisors do whereas non-supervisors believe to a greater extent than supervisors that electronic monitoring has a negative impact in the workplace. Supervisors and non-supervisors also differ in their beliefs about the ability of monitoring to reduce theft and create tension in the workplace, and the need to alert employees when monitoring takes place. Employees of organizations that practice monitoring object to it less then employees of organizations without electronic monitoring. Women, more than men, believe that electronic monitoring reduces theft and embezzlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Oz, Effy & Glass, Richard & Behling, Robert, 1999. "Electronic workplace monitoring: What employees think," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 167-177, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:27:y:1999:i:2:p:167-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(98)00037-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carpenter, Darrell & Maasberg, Michele & Hicks, Chelsea & Chen, Xiaogang, 2016. "A multicultural study of biometric privacy concerns in a fire ground accountability crisis response system," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 735-747.
    2. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2005. "Workplace surveillance, privacy protection, and efficiency wages," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 727-738, December.
    3. Doğru Çağlar, 2021. "The Effects of Electronic Surveillance on Job Tension, Task Performance and Organizational Trust," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 125-143, December.
    4. Iszan Hana Kaharudin & Mohammad Syuhaimi Ab-Rahman & Roslan Abd-Shukor & Azamin Zaharim & Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor & Ahmad Kamal Ariffin Mohd Ihsan & Shahrom Md Zain & Afiq Hipni & Kamisah Osman & Ruszym, 2022. "How Does Supervision Technique Affect Research? Towards Sustainable Performance: Publications and Students from Pure and Social Sciences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Darrell Carpenter & Alexander McLeod & Chelsea Hicks & Michele Maasberg, 2018. "Privacy and biometrics: An empirical examination of employee concerns," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 91-110, February.
    6. Darrell Carpenter & Alexander McLeod & Chelsea Hicks & Michele Maasberg, 0. "Privacy and biometrics: An empirical examination of employee concerns," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:27:y:1999:i:2:p:167-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.