IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v21y1993i3p289-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic justification of advanced manufacturing technology

Author

Listed:
  • Ramasesh, RV
  • Jayakumar, MD

Abstract

Despite the far reaching implications of the advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) for the maintenance and enhancement of a firm's competitive position, the financial justification of investments in AMT has not been easy. Recent research in manufacturing strategy, financial theory, management accounting and organization decision making suggests that the AMT-justification process should involve (i) a strategic analysis to ascertain the strategic fit and the competitive advantage of AMT, (ii) an economic analysis to ascertain the financial viability of AMT and (iii) an understanding of the dynamics of organizational decision making to overcome the barriers to the adoption of AMT. Focusing on the economic analysis we present a concise review of the state of the art and propose a four-level justification framework for investment in AMT. At Level 1 of this framework, we analyze the easily quantifiable benefits and costs using the traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) models. We examine the limitations of the traditional DCF analysis and discuss some refinements suggested in the literature. At Level 2, we develop and illustrate with a numerical example, a stochastic mathematical programming model to quantify the strategic benefits such as flexibility and quality. At Level 3, we quantify the benefits of the time series linkages between the project currently being justified and a related future project using a learning curve model. Finally, at Level 4 we focus on a qualitative assessment of the benefits which were not included in the evaluation at the first three levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramasesh, RV & Jayakumar, MD, 1993. "Economic justification of advanced manufacturing technology," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 289-306, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:21:y:1993:i:3:p:289-306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(93)90087-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Formaneck, Steven D. & Cozzarin, Brian P., 2013. "Technology adoption and training practices as a constrained shortest path problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 459-472.
    2. Adler, Ralph W., 2000. "Strategic investment decision appraisal techniques: The old and the new," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 15-22.
    3. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    4. Meade, L. M. & Liles, D. H. & Sarkis, J., 1997. "Justifying strategic alliances and partnering: a prerequisite for virtual enterprising," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 29-42, February.
    5. Ralph Adler, 2006. "Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 3-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:21:y:1993:i:3:p:289-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.