IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v17y1989i3p209-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The United Kingdom's productivity gap: Its size and causes

Author

Listed:
  • Hitchens, Dmwn
  • Birnie, Je

Abstract

The level of labour productivity in British manufacturing industry is compared to that of the USA and Germany and other industrial economies. American levels of output per head have been two to three times those of the UK throughout this century, while Germany overtook British manufacturing in the 1950's and now has a comparative productivity at least 50% higher. The acceleration in UK productivity growth since 1979 has not yet removed much of the productivity shortfall relative to the rest of the Western world. A review of previous studies shows that Britain has its worst comparative performance in those sectors which tend to be skill and technology intensive; engineering is a notable example. In our consideration of possible explanations of Britain's comparatively poor performance more stress is placed on the human inputs of labour and management than on the quantity of capital, the level or variability of demand, plant or firm size, industrial structure and the degree of foreign ownership. Institutional and cultural factors have produced workers and managers who are not appropriately skilled to achieve the standards of their German or American counterparts in terms of either physical productivity or 'value' productivity (products with value-added, enhanced by superior quality, design, technology or reliability).

Suggested Citation

  • Hitchens, Dmwn & Birnie, Je, 1989. "The United Kingdom's productivity gap: Its size and causes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 209-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:3:p:209-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(89)90027-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:17:y:1989:i:3:p:209-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.