IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v16y1988i2p135-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breakdown theories and complex units--A critique

Author

Listed:
  • Snaddon, Dr

Abstract

The paper deals with breakdown theory of units using construction firms' fleets as an example. A firm usually has a fleet of units such as trucks, concrete mixers, compaction plant, etc. An individual unit such as a truck may be regarded as a structured set of components. A component may be relatively simple e.g. tyres, or complex e.g. an engine. The conflicting breakdown theories for units in a fleet are initially stated. Then plausible hypotheses of the location, cause and responsibility of breakdown, and breakdown pattern on units are outlined from studies. Hypotheses are then tested using data from a cross sectional analysis of construction firms with large diversified fleets. The contribution of the paper is to show that complicated units, operating over varying lives, should not be expected to have differing breakdown rates per unit of time whereas the likelihood of failure of individual components increases with time. It also provides some empirical evidence of this assertion.

Suggested Citation

  • Snaddon, Dr, 1988. "Breakdown theories and complex units--A critique," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 135-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:16:y:1988:i:2:p:135-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0305-0483(88)90044-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:16:y:1988:i:2:p:135-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.