IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v135y2025ics0305048325000337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Dong
  • Zhu, Shuyuan
  • Xie, Jinxing
  • Zhu, Wanshan
  • Zhao, Xiaobo

Abstract

We study two prevalent business strategies: collective buying and referral reward strategies, leveraging social interactions among consumers to incentivize purchases through discounts or rewards. Consumers exhibit heterogeneity in their awareness of the product. Aware consumers pursue discounts or rewards by inviting their peers, which can increase the unaware peers’ valuation of this product. In the collective buying strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and collective buying discounts. Consumers have the option to make individual purchases or form groups. The final demand is contingent on the equilibrium of a Nash game, in which consumers form groups through invitations. In equilibrium, the optimal collective buying strategy proves to be more profitable than the posted price strategy (where consumers can only purchase individually) when the social cost of inviting is moderate, the fraction of aware consumers is not overly large, and the additional value is not negligible. Notably, the lowest collective buying discount arises when the social cost, the fraction of aware consumers, and the additional value are all at moderate levels. In the referral reward strategy, the retailer determines both individual purchase prices and rewards for successful recommendations. We derive the optimal referral reward strategy and further scrutinize the optimal retail strategy by comparing the posted price strategy, collective buying strategy, and referral reward strategy. Our comprehensive analysis reveals non-monotonic shifts in the optimal retail strategy as various parameters change, some of which appear to be novel and unreported in the existing literature. Finally, we extend our collective-buying model to address a scenario where the social cost and consumers’ valuations are continuous.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Dong & Zhu, Shuyuan & Xie, Jinxing & Zhu, Wanshan & Zhao, Xiaobo, 2025. "Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:135:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000337
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2025.103307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000337
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:135:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.