IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v133y2025ics0305048325000106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Homing strategies for asymmetric sellers on differentiated platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiang
  • Wang, Meiqi

Abstract

With the flourishing development of e-marketplace platforms, sellers’ homing strategies have attracted considerable attention and require careful evaluation of the market environment, especially considering platform competition. This study explores two asymmetric sellers' homing and pricing strategies on two asymmetric platforms. The platforms and sellers are differentiated in their credits and boast varied consumers’ willingness to pay. We identify the competition-mitigating effects of utilizing an inferior platform and adopting single-homing strategies. We indicate that such effects should be carefully considered in balance with the valuation-enhancing effect of choosing a superior platform and the market-expanding effect of adopting multi-homing strategy. Moreover, in some situations, the benefits of seller prioritization of platform occupancy and implementation of an “either-or” policy (i.e., mandatory single-homing policy for sellers) can be less than expected. These results enhance our understanding of homing strategy optimization in the face of competition between sellers and platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiang & Wang, Meiqi, 2025. "Homing strategies for asymmetric sellers on differentiated platforms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2025.103284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000106
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.