IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v133y2025ics0305048325000064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-view reject inference for semi-supervised credit scoring with consistency training and three-way decision

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Haoxin
  • Liang, Decui

Abstract

In credit scoring, reject inference based on semi-supervised learning has shown better performance compared to those based on statistical methods. However, the problem of inconsistent data distribution between accepted and rejected samples still exists during model training, which may violate the smoothness assumption of semi-supervised learning. Besides, multi-view learning has demonstrated its effectiveness, but its validity in reject inference still needs to be verified. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-view reject inference approach (MRIA) based on three-way decision and consistency training. Specifically, with the aid of three-way decision, we sift valuable rejected samples from the profitability and accuracy objects, which brings the rejected samples better approximate the smooth assumption of semi-supervised learning. Then, based on the above-mentioned two objects, we construct multi-views by utilizing feature selection and train the reject inference model using consistency training, which can enhance the reliability and robustness. Finally, a dynamic fusion method built on the distance to model (DM) is employed for multi-view fusion. This paper not only theoretically demonstrates that high-quality data augmentation consistency training can result in a smaller error bound for the reject inference tasks, but also verifies the effectiveness of MRIA via a series of experimental analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Haoxin & Liang, Decui, 2025. "Multi-view reject inference for semi-supervised credit scoring with consistency training and three-way decision," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000064
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2025.103280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000064
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2025.103280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048325000064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.