IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v133y2025ics0305048324002342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking outcomes to costs: A unified measure to advance value-based healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Borzée, Joke
  • Cardoen, Brecht
  • Cherchye, Laurens
  • De Rock, Bram
  • Roodhooft, Filip

Abstract

Guided by the Value-Based Healthcare framework, the healthcare sector increasingly aims to maximize patient value by improving the quality of care while containing costs, which requires aligning the interests of patients, health providers and payers. This study addresses the need for advanced patient value measurement techniques to navigate this complex balance by introducing a four-step framework that combines Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. The framework starts by defining Decision-Making Units and specifying the treatment pathway (Step 1), followed by selecting the relevant inputs (i.e., costs) and outputs (i.e., health outcomes) (Step 2). Next, the DEA model is tailored to fit the specific medical context (Step 3), ultimately translating the value equation into unified, individual value scores that rank patients by perceived value (Step 4). Unlike traditional healthcare evaluations, the multiple health outcomes are connected to granular costing information without relying on monetary values or subjective weighting. Using real-life data from a case study focused on psoriasis, we demonstrate that value assessments significantly differ when considering a comprehensive set of health outcomes, rather than relying on a single primary outcome or treating costs and outcomes separately. These holistic value scores are used to pinpoint inefficiencies on an individual level, analyse patterns of health improvements through cluster analysis, and assess the impact of contextual variables on value creation using econometric analysis. Our results revealed the complex interplay between outcomes and costs by identifying factors like the presence of comorbidities, which had no direct influence on costs or outcomes, as overall value driver. In summary, this research proposes an intuitive metric for value benchmarks across time, health providers and treatments, ultimately contributing to the effective delivery of personalized and value-based healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Borzée, Joke & Cardoen, Brecht & Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Roodhooft, Filip, 2025. "Linking outcomes to costs: A unified measure to advance value-based healthcare," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048324002342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324002342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:133:y:2025:i:c:s0305048324002342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.