IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v39y1991i2p217-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating a survival function with incomplete cause-of-death data

Author

Listed:
  • Lo, Shaw-Hwa

Abstract

We propose a random censorship model which permits uncertainty in the cause of death assessments for a subset of the subjects in a survival experiment. A nonparametric maximum likelihood approach and a "self-consistency" approach are considered. The solution sets corresponding to both approaches are found. They are infinite and identical. Only some of the solutions are consistent; i.e., the MLEs and self-consistent estimators are not consistent in general. Two estimates are thus proposed and their asymptotic properties are studied. It is shown that both estimates are strongly consistent and converge to Gaussian processes. The covariance structures of these Gaussian processes are derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Lo, Shaw-Hwa, 1991. "Estimating a survival function with incomplete cause-of-death data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 217-235, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:39:y:1991:i:2:p:217-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-259X(91)90098-M
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Qihua & Liu, Wei & Liu, Chunling, 2009. "Probability density estimation for survival data with censoring indicators missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(5), pages 835-850, May.
    2. Wang, Qihua & Shen, Junshan, 2008. "Estimation and confidence bands of a conditional survival function with censoring indicators missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(5), pages 928-948, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:39:y:1991:i:2:p:217-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.