IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jhecon/v29y2010i2p325-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The additive utility assumption of the QALY model revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Gandjour, Afschin
  • Gafni, Amiram

Abstract

Quality-adjusted life years are valid representations of the preferences of individuals for health outcomes only under a set of restrictive assumptions. One of the key assumptions is additive utility independence (AUI). Recently, Bleichrodt and Filko [Bleichrodt and Filko, 2008. Journal of Health Economics 27 (5), 1237-1249] presented a new test for AUI, the test for generalized marginality (GM). Based on a student survey showing that violations observed at an individual level cancel out at the group level they concluded that use of the QALY model for economic evaluations in health care is supported. In this comment we argue that this conclusion is not warranted for 2 independent reasons: (i) the GM test is not sufficient to claim AUI both at an individual and group (i.e., aggregated) level and (ii) the student survey is not appropriate to make generalized statements about preferences at the population level.

Suggested Citation

  • Gandjour, Afschin & Gafni, Amiram, 2010. "The additive utility assumption of the QALY model revisited," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 325-328, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:29:y:2010:i:2:p:325-328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-6296(09)00118-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edouard Kujawski & Evangelos Triantaphyllou & Juri Yanase, 2019. "Additive Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models: Misleading Aids for Life-Critical Shared Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(4), pages 437-449, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:29:y:2010:i:2:p:325-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505560 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.