IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jetheo/v208y2023ics0022053123000030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach to the uniqueness of equilibrium with CRRA preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Won, Dong Chul

Abstract

This paper investigates the uniqueness of equilibrium in the economy where agents have preferences with possibly distinct levels of relative risk aversion. Equilibrium prices exist in a price range determined by micro and macroeconomic information. Macroeconomic information is inferred from two representative-agent economies, which provide lower and upper bounds on aggregate demand, respectively. Analysis of the first and second-order price effects shows that individual demand has a unique inflection point at which the income effect maximally dominates the substitution effect. In contrast, aggregate demand may have multiple inflection points, which creates multiple equilibria. Sufficient conditions for the uniqueness of equilibrium are characterized by the local behavior of individual demand at the inflection point. They require that aggregate demand must have no more than two inflection points in the equilibrium price range. The result of this paper sheds light on the Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu theory that has negative implications for the uniqueness of equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Won, Dong Chul, 2023. "A new approach to the uniqueness of equilibrium with CRRA preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:208:y:2023:i:c:s0022053123000030
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2023.105607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053123000030
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jet.2023.105607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Chipman, 2010. "Multiple equilibrium under CES preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 45(1), pages 129-145, October.
    2. Felix Kubler & Larry Selden & Xiao Wei, 2013. "Inferior Good and Giffen Behavior for Investing and Borrowing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(2), pages 1034-1053, April.
    3. Bhagwati, Jagdish N & Brecher, Richard A & Hatta, Tatsuo, 1983. "The Generalized Theory of Transfers and Welfare: Bilateral Transfers in a Multilateral World," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 606-618, September.
    4. Hens, Thorsten & Loeffler, Andras, 1995. "Gross substitution in financial markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 39-43, July.
    5. Chipman, John S., 1974. "Homothetic preferences and aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 26-38, May.
    6. Donald J. Brown & Chris Shannon, 2000. "Uniqueness, Stability, and Comparative Statics in Rationalizable Walrasian Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(6), pages 1529-1540, November.
    7. Douglas W. Diamond & Philip H. Dybvig, 2000. "Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, vol. 24(Win), pages 14-23.
    8. Chipman, John S. & Moore, James C., 1979. "On social welfare functions and the aggregation of preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 111-139, August.
    9. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    10. Alexis Akira Toda & Kieran James Walsh & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2020. "The Equity Premium and the One Percent," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(8), pages 3583-3623.
    11. Pascal Gauthier & Timothy J. Kehoe & Erwan Quintin, 2022. "Constructing pure-exchange economies with many equilibria," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 541-564, April.
    12. Giménez, Eduardo L., 2022. "Offer curves and uniqueness of competitive equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Alexis Akira Toda & Kieran James Walsh, 2017. "Edgeworth box economies with multiple equilibria," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 65-80, April.
    14. Hildenbrand, Werner, 1983. "On the "Law of Demand."," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 997-1019, July.
    15. Robert T. Jensen & Nolan H. Miller, 2008. "Giffen Behavior and Subsistence Consumption," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1553-1577, September.
    16. Geanakoplos, John & Walsh, Kieran James, 2018. "Uniqueness and stability of equilibrium in economies with two goods," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 261-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toda, Alexis Akira & Walsh, Kieran James, 2024. "Recent advances on uniqueness of competitive equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toda, Alexis Akira & Walsh, Kieran James, 2024. "Recent advances on uniqueness of competitive equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Giménez, Eduardo L., 2022. "Offer curves and uniqueness of competitive equilibrium," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Andrea Loi & Stefano Matta, 2023. "Endowments, patience types, and uniqueness in two-good HARA utility economies," Papers 2308.09347, arXiv.org.
    4. Lilia Maliar & Serguei Maliar, 2005. "An Analytical Construction Of Constantinides¿ Social Utility Function," Working Papers. Serie AD 2005-25, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    5. Toda, Alexis Akira, 2019. "Wealth distribution with random discount factors," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 101-113.
    6. Andrea Loi & Stefano Matta, 2024. "Endowments, patience types, and uniqueness in two-good HARA utility economies," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 12(2), pages 157-165, December.
    7. Alexis Akira Toda & Kieran James Walsh, 2017. "Edgeworth box economies with multiple equilibria," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 65-80, April.
    8. Geanakoplos, John & Walsh, Kieran James, 2018. "Uniqueness and stability of equilibrium in economies with two goods," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 261-272.
    9. Andrea Loi & Stefano Matta, 2021. "Risk aversion and uniqueness of equilibrium: a polynomial approach," Papers 2107.01947, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    10. Bar Light, 2020. "Uniqueness of equilibrium in a Bewley–Aiyagari model," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(2), pages 435-450, March.
    11. Centeno, Alex, 2020. "A Note on the Application of Schubert Calculus in Heterogeneous Economies With Pure Exchange," MPRA Paper 98944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Aldasoro, Iñaki & Delli Gatti, Domenico & Faia, Ester, 2017. "Bank networks: Contagion, systemic risk and prudential policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 164-188.
    13. Cheng, John Q & Wellman, Michael P, 1998. "The WALRAS Algorithm: A Convergent Distributed Implementation of General Equilibrium Outcomes," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Finn Christensen, 2019. "Comparative statics and heterogeneity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(3), pages 665-702, April.
    15. Cyrinus B. Elegbede & Ludovic A. Julien & Louis Mesnard, 2022. "On preferences and taxation mechanisms in strategic bilateral exchange," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(1), pages 43-73, March.
    16. Giese, Julia & Nelson, Benjamin & Tanaka, Misa & Tarashev, Nikola, 2013. "Financial Stability Paper No 21: How could macroprudential policy affect financial system resilience and credit? Lessons from the literature," Bank of England Financial Stability Papers 21, Bank of England.
    17. Yakar Kannai & Larry Selden, 2014. "Violation of the Law of Demand," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 55(1), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Le Van, Cuong & Pham, Ngoc-Sang, 2020. "Demand and equilibrium with inferior and Giffen behaviors," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-50.
    19. Parenti, Mathieu & Ushchev, Philip & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2017. "Toward a theory of monopolistic competition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 86-115.
    20. Athreya, Kartik B., 2014. "Big Ideas in Macroeconomics: A Nontechnical View," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019736, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unique equilibrium; Constant relative risk aversion; Higher-order price effect; Quasi-convex demand; Law of demand;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies
    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium
    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:208:y:2023:i:c:s0022053123000030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622869 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.