IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jelect/v20y2007i3p46-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maryland versus New Jersey: Is There a "Best" Competitive Bid Process?

Author

Listed:
  • LaCasse, Chantale
  • Wininger, Thomas

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • LaCasse, Chantale & Wininger, Thomas, 2007. "Maryland versus New Jersey: Is There a "Best" Competitive Bid Process?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 46-59, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jelect:v:20:y:2007:i:3:p:46-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040-6190(07)00019-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeria Di Cosmo & Elisa Trujillo-Baute, 2018. "From Forward to Spot Prices: Producers, Retailers and Loss Averse Consumers in Electricity Markets," Working Papers 2018.31, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Furió, Dolores & Chuliá, Helena, 2012. "Price and volatility dynamics between electricity and fuel costs: Some evidence for Spain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2058-2065.
    3. Brown, David P. & Eckert, Andrew & Olmstead, Derek E.H., 2022. "Procurement auctions for regulated retail service contracts in restructured electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Peña, Juan Ignacio & Rodriguez, Rosa, 2018. "Default supply auctions in electricity markets: Challenges and proposals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 142-151.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jelect:v:20:y:2007:i:3:p:46-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600875/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.