IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v88y2013icp3-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South Korea's economic future: Industrial policy, or economic democracy?

Author

Listed:
  • Holcombe, Randall G.

Abstract

Many South Koreans believe that the country's remarkable economic successes over the past half-century are the product of an industrial policy that made Korean industry competitive in world markets. While there is widespread sentiment in favor of maintaining the emphasis on industrial policy, others believe industrial policy has generated benefits for some Koreans at the expense of the welfare of working-class Koreans. This has resulted in a push toward economic democracy to more equitably distribute the gains from increased productivity. Neither industrial policy nor economic democracy are in the best interest of Koreans. Rather, a laissez faire policy of minimal government interference will provide the best environment to foster South Korea's continued economic progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Holcombe, Randall G., 2013. "South Korea's economic future: Industrial policy, or economic democracy?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 3-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:88:y:2013:i:c:p:3-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268111002046
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heo,Uk & Roehrig,Terence, 2010. "South Korea since 1980," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521743532, October.
    2. Berggren, Niclas, 2003. "The Benefits of Economic Freedom: A Survey," Ratio Working Papers 4, The Ratio Institute.
    3. Randall G. Holcombe and James D. Gwartney, 2010. "Unions, Economic Freedom, and Growth," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, Winter.
    4. James D. Gwartney & Randall G. Holcombe & Robert A. Lawson, 2004. "Economic Freedom, Institutional Quality,and Cross-Country Differences in Income and Growth," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 24(3), pages 205-233, Fall.
    5. Baumol, William J., 1996. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 3-22, January.
    6. Heo,Uk & Roehrig,Terence, 2010. "South Korea since 1980," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521761161, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Hou & Xinhai Lu & Shiman Wu & Shangan Ke & Jia Li, 2022. "Analysis of the Dynamic Relationship between Green Economy Efficiency and Urban Land Development Intensity in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Hidemichi Fujii & Yoshitaka Sakakura & Atsushi Hagiwara & John Bostock & Kiyoshi Soyano & Yoshiki Matsushita, 2017. "Research and Development Strategy for Fishery Technology Innovation for Sustainable Fishery Resource Management in North-East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan F. Gohmann & Bradley K. Hobbs & Myra J. McCrickard, 2016. "Productive versus unproductive entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(2), pages 145-160, August.
    2. Judit Kapás & Pál Czeglédi, 2017. "Institutions and policies of economic freedom: different effects on income and growth," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 34(2), pages 259-282, August.
    3. Deerfield, Amanda & Elert, Niklas, 2022. "Entrepreneurship and Regulatory Voids: The Case of Ridesharing," Working Paper Series 1426, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    4. Whitney Buser, 2011. "The impact of fiscal decentralization on economics performance in high-income OECD nations: an institutional approach," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-48, October.
    5. Christopher John Boudreaux, 2015. "Democratic age and the size of governmen," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(3), pages 1531-1542.
    6. Jeffery S. McMullen & D. Ray Bagby & Leslie E. Palich, 2008. "Economic Freedom and the Motivation to Engage in Entrepreneurial Action," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(5), pages 875-895, September.
    7. Radu Ioan Åžimandan, 2015. "Free to Enterprise : Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship In Romania," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 18(56), pages 87-100, June,.
    8. Cosmin Marinescu, 2013. "Institutional Quality of the Business Environment: Some European Practices in a Comparative Analysis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(33), pages 270-287, February.
    9. Mandić Dragan & Borović Zoran & Jovićević Mladen, 2017. "Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurial Activity: Evidence from EU 11 Countries," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 11-17, December.
    10. Berggren, Niclas & Bergh, Andreas & Bjørnskov, Christian, 2012. "The growth effects of institutional instability," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 187-224, June.
    11. Ceyhun Haydaroglu, 2016. "The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Freedom on Economic Growth: The Case of BRICS Countries," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, June.
    12. Boettke, Peter & Fink, Alexander, 2011. "Institutions first," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 499-504, December.
    13. Noha Emara (a) and Loreto Reyes Rebolledo (b), 2021. "Economic Freedom and Economic Performance: Does Good Governance Matter? The Case of APAC and OECD Countries," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 1-32, March.
    14. Elchin Suleymanov & Elvin Alirzayev & Mammad Talibli, 2019. "Role of Economic Freedom in Attracting Investments in the Context of Azerbaijan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 87-95.
    15. Christian Bjørnskov & Nicolai Foss, 2010. "Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurial Activity: Some Cross-Country Evidence," Springer Books, in: Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Culture, chapter 0, pages 201-225, Springer.
    16. Trung V. Vu, 2022. "Does institutional quality foster economic complexity? The fundamental drivers of productive capabilities," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1571-1604, September.
    17. Randall G. Holcombe, 2022. "Creative destruction: getting ahead and staying ahead in a capitalist economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 467-480, December.
    18. Angulo-Guerrero, María J. & Pérez-Moreno, Salvador & Abad-Guerrero, Isabel M., 2017. "How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 30-37.
    19. Lucas, David & Boudreaux, Christopher, 2018. "Federal Regulation, Job Creation, and the Moderating Effect of State Economic Freedom," MPRA Paper 92593, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. David S. Lucas & Christopher J. Boudreaux, 2019. "The Interdependence of Hierarchical Institutions: Federal Regulation, Job Creation, and the Moderating Effect of State Economic Freedom," Papers 1903.02924, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Korea; Industrial policy; Economic democracy; Economic development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P11 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:88:y:2013:i:c:p:3-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.