IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v232y2025ics0167268125000575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social norm uncertainty: Measurement using coordination games and behavioral relevance

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Robert

Abstract

We propose a modified pure coordination game to elicit social norm perception as distributions at the individual level. In addition to receiving point estimations equivalent to Krupka and Weber (2013), the dispersion of individual-level norm distributions indicates a subject's social norm uncertainty. In an experiment involving allocation decisions, we measure and gauge the behavioral relevance of norm uncertainty. We find that subjects exhibit considerable uncertainty regarding both injunctive and descriptive social norms. Moreover, social norm uncertainty weakens the relationship between norms as point estimations and revealed social preferences. Finally, the more confident subjects are about their own norm perception, the more they disagree at the population level. The results indicate that uncertainty is a distinct and behaviorally relevant dimension of norm perception that reduces norm compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Robert, 2025. "Social norm uncertainty: Measurement using coordination games and behavioral relevance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:232:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125000575
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125000575
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social norms; Uncertainty; Disagreement; Polarization; Coordination; Methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:232:y:2025:i:c:s0167268125000575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.