IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v229y2025ics0167268124004542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social value of information uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • He, Xue-Zhong (Tony)
  • Shi, Lei
  • Tolotti, Marco

Abstract

We analyze the welfare implication of information acquisition uncertainty in a Grossman–Stiglitz economy with endowment shocks. Investors make optimal probabilistic information acquisition choices subject to an increasing and convex monetary cost. This uncertainty gives rise to an anticipatory benefit so that informed trading can improve social welfare. Although informed trading distorts risk-sharing and destroys trading opportunities, the welfare improvement can be significant when investors have weak risk-sharing incentives, the endowment shocks are small and less informative about the aggregate endowment, and the risky payoff information is more noisy. Moreover, with heterogeneous endowments, there can be a continuum of Pareto optimal information-acquisition equilibria. Therefore, regulations aiming to level the playing field must be exercised with caution.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Xue-Zhong (Tony) & Shi, Lei & Tolotti, Marco, 2025. "The social value of information uncertainty," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:229:y:2025:i:c:s0167268124004542
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124004542
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social welfare; Rational expectations equilibrium; Informed trading; Information acquisition uncertainty; Probabilistic choices;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:229:y:2025:i:c:s0167268124004542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jebo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.