IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v97y2025ics0047235225000273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To report or not to report: Exploring the motivations and factors associated with reporting of ransomware victimisation among entrepreneurs

Author

Listed:
  • Matthijsse, Sifra R.
  • van’t Hoff-de Goede, M. Susanne
  • Leukfeldt, E. Rutger

Abstract

Although ransomware attacks are considered to be a prominent cyberthreat for organisations, little is known about reporting by entrepreneurs after ransomware victimisation. The current study uses two surveys to explore reporting behaviour among freelancers and small and medium-sized enterprises in the Netherlands. One survey was conducted among entrepreneurs who were victimised by ransomware (n=189). Another survey was conducted among entrepreneurs who were not victimised by ransomware (n=2,496) and included a vignette experiment. While about 92% of the entrepreneurs in the vignette experiment indicated that they would contact the police, only about 18% of the victims did, citing reasons such as solving it themselves or with the help of another party and the belief that the police will not do anything about it. Reporting to the police and to other organisations was related to the emotional and financial impact, with the exception of reporting to the police by victims. There was no association between a negative affective response and situational factors such as having a back-up and reporting among victims and non-victims.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthijsse, Sifra R. & van’t Hoff-de Goede, M. Susanne & Leukfeldt, E. Rutger, 2025. "To report or not to report: Exploring the motivations and factors associated with reporting of ransomware victimisation among entrepreneurs," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000273
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000273
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.