IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v97y2025ics0047235225000212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greener the safer? Effects of urban green space on community safety and perception of safety using satellite and street view imagery data

Author

Listed:
  • He, Qian
  • Wu, Ling
  • Lee, Claire Seungeun
  • Zhu, Chunwu
  • Bai, Weishan
  • Guo, Weichen
  • Ye, Xinyue

Abstract

This study explores the link between urban green spaces, street crime, and safety perception through environmental criminology and big data analytics. While past research highlights green space benefits, findings on its relationship with crime remain inconclusive. Using satellite and Google Street View imagery, we develop a fine-scale urban green index and measure safety perception. A neighborhood disadvantage index, derived through principal component analysis of socio-economic factors, further informs our analysis. Geographically Weighted Regression results reveal that urban green spaces are significantly associated with reduced street crime and stronger perceptions of safety, even when controlling for other factors. These findings highlight the potential of urban green spaces to enhance community safety and foster a sense of security in public spaces, offering critical insights for urban planning and policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • He, Qian & Wu, Ling & Lee, Claire Seungeun & Zhu, Chunwu & Bai, Weishan & Guo, Weichen & Ye, Xinyue, 2025. "Greener the safer? Effects of urban green space on community safety and perception of safety using satellite and street view imagery data," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000212
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000212
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.