IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v97y2025ics0047235225000194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is a neighborhood? A concept consensus review of recent criminological literature

Author

Listed:
  • Linning, Shannon J.
  • Mierzwa, Tyler
  • Cheung, Jeremy
  • Eck, John E.

Abstract

Since the Chicago School, neighborhoods have been a staple in criminology research. However, some criminologists argue that there is no consensus on the definition of a neighborhood. This is important because if criminologists cannot agree on the theoretical concept of neighborhoods, they cannot synthesize neighborhood research across multiple studies. To test the “no consensus” assertion, we conducted a concept consensus review of all articles using the term “neighborhood” in the top 10 journals in criminology from 2010 to 2020. We found 310 articles where the term neighborhood was an important concept in the study. Of these articles, only 15 provided an explicit conceptual definition. An additional 6 articles provided ambiguous conceptual definitions. We probed the content of conceptual definitions and found they varied widely, often omitting essential elements. Finally, we examined the operational definitions used in the 310 studies and found 50 unique operationalizations of neighborhood. Therefore, we conclude that there is no consensus about the theoretical meaning of neighborhood in criminology. Criminologists should either reach a consensus about the meaning of neighborhood or abandon the concept and use newer alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Linning, Shannon J. & Mierzwa, Tyler & Cheung, Jeremy & Eck, John E., 2025. "What is a neighborhood? A concept consensus review of recent criminological literature," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000194
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000194
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.