IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v97y2025ics0047235225000078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Static-99R valid for all men with ‘identifiable’ victims? Examining cases of online sexual solicitation of children

Author

Listed:
  • Paquette, Sarah
  • Eke, Angela W.
  • Scott, Shelby
  • Guay, Jean-Pierre
  • Duval, Manon
  • Fortin, Francis
  • Seto, Michael C.
  • Paradis, Yves

Abstract

This study assessed the predictive validity of the Static-99R among 172 men convicted of online sexual solicitation of minors in Canada – 93 from clinical settings and 79 from police investigations. It examined recidivism rates for sexual (any, contact, and child luring) and nonsexual violent offenses, comparing men with and without intent to engage in contact sexual offenses. Results showed the Static-99R effectively predicted recidivism, with modest to strong accuracy for contact sexual recidivism (Harrell's Cs = 0.78–0.94), any sexual recidivism (Harrell's Cs = 0.66–0.80), and child luring-specific recidivism (Harrell's Cs = 0.61–0.71). Predictive validity was consistent regardless of offenders' intent to engage in contact sexual offenses. Calibration analyses indicated the Static-99R underestimated the number of sexual recidivists in our sample. The study also highlighted differences between online and offline offenders, noting that online offenders often had numerous victims, which could complicate risk assessments. Discussion includes the relevance of Static-99R items related to victim characteristics and the need to refine tools for online offenders. Incorporating unique factors of online offenses may enhance the tool's predictive validity and practical application. Future research should address these dynamics to improve risk assessment for online sexual offenders.

Suggested Citation

  • Paquette, Sarah & Eke, Angela W. & Scott, Shelby & Guay, Jean-Pierre & Duval, Manon & Fortin, Francis & Seto, Michael C. & Paradis, Yves, 2025. "Is the Static-99R valid for all men with ‘identifiable’ victims? Examining cases of online sexual solicitation of children," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:97:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225000078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.