IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v82y2022ics0047235222001106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abuse, neglect and witnessing violence during childhood within justice-involved samples: A meta-analysis of the prevalence and nature of gender differences and similarities

Author

Listed:
  • Wanamaker, Kayla A.
  • Brown, Shelley L.
  • Czerwinsky, Allysa M.

Abstract

Justice-involved populations have often experienced abuse and neglect and have often been exposed to violence in the home. However, reported prevalence rates have been inconsistent and boys and men, and girls and women reportedly experience different types of victimization, although results have been mixed. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the literature on childhood victimization prevalence rates for boys and men, and girls and women. A systematic review of the literature led to 62 studies (170 effect sizes) that reported the rate of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, neglect, and exposure to violence among justice-involved samples (230,581 boys and men and 74,608 girls and women). Rates of abuse, neglect and witnessed violence were high for both genders. The prevalence rates were higher for girls and women than boys and men in all categories: physical abuse (43.8% vs. 34.3%), sexual abuse (35.4% vs. 13.1%), emotional abuse (44.6% vs. 29.0%), child neglect (35.3% vs. 27.3%), witnessed violence (47.6% vs. 41.4%) and any childhood victimization (59.9% vs. 46.4%). Differences were statistically significant for physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, and neglect. Despite the methodological limitations associated with many of the primary studies, the results highlight the need to implement trauma-responsive policies in correctional settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanamaker, Kayla A. & Brown, Shelley L. & Czerwinsky, Allysa M., 2022. "Abuse, neglect and witnessing violence during childhood within justice-involved samples: A meta-analysis of the prevalence and nature of gender differences and similarities," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222001106
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235222001106
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:82:y:2022:i:c:s0047235222001106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.