IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v73y2021ics0047235221000143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Still in the shadows: The unresponsiveness of stalking prosecution rates to increased legislative attention

Author

Listed:
  • Bouffard, Leana A.
  • Bouffard, Jeff A.
  • Nobles, Matt R.
  • Askew, LaQuana

Abstract

Stalking is a serious crime involving a course of repeated conduct that frightens, threatens, or harasses the victim. Despite growing scholarly attention, the criminal justice system response to stalking has been understudied. Prior research suggests that stalking, like other interpersonal crimes (i.e., sexual assault, domestic violence) is underreported; however, stalking cases are also inconsistently classified and managed by law enforcement (Brady & Nobles, 2017). This exploratory study used official court data from Houston, Texas to examine trends in stalking cases relative to two major revisions of Texas anti-stalking statutes. Results demonstrate that trends in arrests with intent to prosecute were stable over time and that very few cases of stalking were prosecuted in this jurisdiction during any given year, even as a comparison trend for the broader category of harassment charges showed escalation over time, consistent with population growth and other extra-legal influences. These findings suggest that stalking cases remain rarely prosecuted despite increasing awareness and provisions for enhanced penalties under Texas law. Implications for research and policy are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouffard, Leana A. & Bouffard, Jeff A. & Nobles, Matt R. & Askew, LaQuana, 2021. "Still in the shadows: The unresponsiveness of stalking prosecution rates to increased legislative attention," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0047235221000143
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235221000143
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0047235221000143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.