Author
Listed:
- Marlowe, Douglas B.
- Festinger, David S.
- Dugosh, Karen L.
- Caron, Anne
- Podkopacz, Marcy R.
- Clements, Nicolle T.
Abstract
Purpose This field trial examined the process of assigning drug-involved offenders to dispositions based on their criminogenic risks and needs.Methods Probation officers administered the Risk and Needs Triage (RANT)(TM) to 627 felony drug and property offenders at the pre-trial stage or shortly after sentencing to probation. The RANT(TM) was evaluated for internal scale consistency, factor structure, and predictive validity for re-arrest and re-conviction rates within 12Â months of case disposition. Exploratory analyses examined whether recidivism was lower for participants who were assigned to an appropriate disposition given their assessment results.Results The RANT(TM) demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and factorial validity, and significantly predicted re-arrest and re-conviction rates within 12Â months of case disposition. There was no racial or gender bias in the prediction of recidivism. Non-significant trends favored better outcomes for participants who were assigned to the indicated dispositions.Conclusions The results lend support for the RANT(TM) as a dispositional triage tool for drug-involved defendants and probationers at or near the point of arrest. The results also lend tentative support to the hypothesis that outcomes might be better if drug-involved offenders were matched to appropriate dispositions based on their risk-and-need profiles. Directions for future research are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Marlowe, Douglas B. & Festinger, David S. & Dugosh, Karen L. & Caron, Anne & Podkopacz, Marcy R. & Clements, Nicolle T., 2011.
"Targeting dispositions for drug-involved offenders: A field trial of the Risk and Needs Triage (RANT)(TM),"
Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 253-260, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:39:y:2011:i:3:p:253-260
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:39:y:2011:i:3:p:253-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.