IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v37yi1p65-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Police-probation partnerships: Professional identity and the sharing of coercive power

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy, David
  • Lutze, Faith

Abstract

As formal police-probation partnerships become more commonplace, the occasional incompatibility of police and probation functions becomes increasingly obvious. Understanding how police-probation partnerships create unique pressures on officers and ultimately reconciling the real or perceived incompatibility of police and probation objectives is an important prerequisite to partnership success. Few studies had considered how inter-agency collaborations have the potential to alter the role distinctions between police and probation officers and how the quality, diversity, and effectiveness of the services that they provide may be compromised or enhanced. This study, based on interviews with police and probation officers participating in a formally organized police-probation partnership in Spokane, Washington considered how close working relationships may influence the professional orientations of the participating officers. Findings suggest that tension between organizational objectives threatens to create an imbalance of power between partnership participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy, David & Lutze, Faith, 2009. "Police-probation partnerships: Professional identity and the sharing of coercive power," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 65-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:37:y::i:1:p:65-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2352(08)00144-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phansamai Oupady & Shixiang Chen & Vilaikham Douansouvanh & Bienmali Kombate, 2022. "Ending Modern-Day Slavery: A Research on China and Laos Anti-Human Trafficking Efforts," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(3), pages 88109-88109, December.
    2. Kim, Bitna & Gerber, Jurg & Beto, Dan Richard, 2010. "Listening to law enforcement officers: The promises and problems of police - adult probation partnerships," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 625-632, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:37:y::i:1:p:65-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.