IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v192y2025ics0148296325001407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recurring versus one-time donation requests: The toll on attracting donors

Author

Listed:
  • Ho, Cony Ming-Shen
  • Chin, Shih-Chun (Daniel)
  • Wang, TzuShuo Ryan

Abstract

Non-profit marketers often design campaigns that ask donors to contribute recurringly. While past research has implied the benefits of giving recurring donations, across six studies using both archival and experimental data, we find convergent evidence that consumers are less attracted to contribute to a non-profit’s recurring (vs. one-time) donation solicitations. Our results suggest that the heightened pain of giving from recurring (vs. one-time) solicitations mediates the effect. Furthermore, we find that the mediating effect of pain of giving attenuates for less frugal consumers, and that the negative effect of recurring (vs. one-time) solicitations on donation willingness mitigates when the solicitations ask for time (vs. monetary) donations. Finally, reconciling our findings with prior research on temporal framing, we find that the effect reverses when a total expected donation amount is salient. This research informs the unintended consequences of recurring donation requests and suggests practical interventions for practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho, Cony Ming-Shen & Chin, Shih-Chun (Daniel) & Wang, TzuShuo Ryan, 2025. "Recurring versus one-time donation requests: The toll on attracting donors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001407
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001407
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.