IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v192y2025ics0148296325001225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do employees benefit from engaging in status-striving strategies? The roles of leader hostility and leader trust in employees

Author

Listed:
  • Ni, Dan
  • Zheng, Xiaoming
  • Lin, Jiaxin

Abstract

Drawing on the evolutionary social psychological theory of status, we examine how and when employee dominance and prestige influence leaders’ interpersonal reactions. Using data from a three-wave survey of Chinese workers and studies using two experimental designs with Western samples, we find that, in general, employee dominance is positively related to leader hostility toward employees and, in turn, negatively related to employee performance evaluations and leader helping behavior. Conversely, employee prestige is negatively related to leader hostility toward employees, such that leaders are less likely to evaluate employee performance negatively and more likely to help employees. In addition, the level of leader trust in employees moderates the effects of employee dominance and prestige on leader hostility toward employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Ni, Dan & Zheng, Xiaoming & Lin, Jiaxin, 2025. "Do employees benefit from engaging in status-striving strategies? The roles of leader hostility and leader trust in employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001225
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001225
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:192:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325001225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.