IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v191y2025ics0148296325000931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in social entrepreneurial activity engagement: The effect of fundamental preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Stroila, Iulia
  • Shi, Henry

Abstract

Despite recognising social entrepreneurship as a contemporary approach to societal challenges, our understanding of what drives individuals’ engagement in social entrepreneurial activity (SEA) remains underdeveloped. Viewing social entrepreneurship as a choice influenced by societal norms, we emphasise the role of fundamental preferences as normative cultural aspects that inform decision-making and behaviour. Drawing on gender role congruity theory and data from the Global Preferences Survey, we investigate how fundamental preferences and gender interact to shape SEA engagement. Our results indicate that in societies with a strong preference for altruism, men are more likely to engage in SEA than women. Conversely, in societies characterised by negative reciprocity and trust, women exhibit higher SEA engagement than men. By challenging traditional gender role assumptions, our study enhances understanding of multilevel determinants of SEA from a gender role congruity perspective, highlights the role of fundamental preferences, and expands knowledge on gender effects in social entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Stroila, Iulia & Shi, Henry, 2025. "Gender differences in social entrepreneurial activity engagement: The effect of fundamental preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000931
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000931
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:191:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.