IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v190y2025ics0148296325000645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing AI coaching and sales manager coaching: A construal-level approach

Author

Listed:
  • Casenave, Eric
  • Schmitt, Laurianne

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can provide salespeople with detailed feedback and recommendations before, during, and after their sales tasks, potentially replacing sales managers. This study uses two experiments, involving 244 and 310 sales professionals, to compare the effects of AI coaching and manager coaching on salespeople’s self-efficacy and their intention to use coaching. Drawing on construal-level theory, we show that coaching framed at either a low construal level or high construal level should align with the perceived distance of the coach. The findings reveal that a manager coach employing low construal coaching positively impacts salespeople’s self-efficacy, increasing their likelihood of using the coaching. However, low construal coaching is less effective than high construal coaching when delivered by AI, which is perceived as more distant than a manager. While AI coaching holds potential for fostering salespeople’s development, sales managers should carefully consider the impact of the completeness and precision of AI coaching.

Suggested Citation

  • Casenave, Eric & Schmitt, Laurianne, 2025. "Comparing AI coaching and sales manager coaching: A construal-level approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000645
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000645
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.