IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v190y2025ics0148296325000633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with uncertainty: The interaction of psychological safety and authentic leadership in their effects on defensive decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Artinger, Florian M.
  • Marx-Fleck, Stefanie
  • Junker, Nina M.
  • Gigerenzer, Gerd
  • Artinger, Sabrina
  • van Dick, Rolf

Abstract

Defensive decision making occurs when employees do not decide in the best interest of the organization but rather opt for a personally safer alternative. Analyzing defensive decision making through the lens of the behavioral theory of the firm, we hypothesized that psychological safety and authentic leadership mitigate defensive decisions as they reduce the perceived uncertainty should anything go wrong. An experimental scenario study with 315 managers in a large organization provides causal evidence that the combination of low psychological safety and low authentic leadership increases defensive decisions. Whereas a leader’s authenticity offset a lack of psychological safety, it did not further reduce defensive decisions if psychological safety was present. We developed a tool that provides a first estimate of the consequences of defensive decision making in terms of forgone opportunities which equate to 10.8% of the annual revenue for the organization studied. Effectively coping with uncertainty is thus highly relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Artinger, Florian M. & Marx-Fleck, Stefanie & Junker, Nina M. & Gigerenzer, Gerd & Artinger, Sabrina & van Dick, Rolf, 2025. "Coping with uncertainty: The interaction of psychological safety and authentic leadership in their effects on defensive decision making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000633
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000633
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.