IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v190y2025ics0148296325000566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering salespeople in complex negotiations: autonomy and leeway in preparation and concession-making

Author

Listed:
  • Lai-Bennejean, Christine
  • Arndt, Aaron D

Abstract

This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lai-Bennejean, Christine & Arndt, Aaron D, 2025. "Empowering salespeople in complex negotiations: autonomy and leeway in preparation and concession-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000566
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000566
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.