IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v190y2025ics0148296325000414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in a cross-country context: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Wanli
  • Yan, Tiantian
  • Li, Yue

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) may be beneficial for enhancing firms’ value according to the instrumental stakeholder theory. Nevertheless, the empirical evidence is inconclusive. We conduct a meta-analysis to synthesize and clarify the heterogeneity of findings from the literature, using data manually gathered from 223 studies in the USA, China, Europe and other regions from 1984 to 2023. We find that the relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP) is generally positive, which suggests that CSR does improve CFP but differs across the measurements of social and financial performance, which is the strongest when both are measured with surveys. These positive signaling impacts are more likely in China, Africa, and other developing economies. They are more prominent in countries with weaker financial markets, worse environmental performance, feminine culture, and voluntary CSR disclosure. Our inferences emphasize that signaling theory and the institutional-based perspective can jointly contribute to CSR premium research.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Wanli & Yan, Tiantian & Li, Yue, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in a cross-country context: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000414
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000414
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:190:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325000414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.