IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v15y1987i2p173-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical comparison of alternative methods for principal component extraction

Author

Listed:
  • Hubbard, Raymond
  • Allen, Stuart J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubbard, Raymond & Allen, Stuart J., 1987. "An empirical comparison of alternative methods for principal component extraction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 173-190, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:15:y:1987:i:2:p:173-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0148-2963(84)90047-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuanjun Xie & Li Peng & Xin Zuo & Min Li, 2016. "The Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale Using a Chinese Military Sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, February.
    2. A. Oumlil & Joseph Balloun, 1994. "Some simple structure significance tests for exploratory component analysis with market survey data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 371-381, November.
    3. Letizia Caso & Andrea Greco & Eleonora Florio & Nicola Palena, 2021. "Assessment of Family, Peers, and Externalising Behaviour Dimensions in Adolescence: The Proposal of a Comprehensive Instrument (FPEB)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Mohamad D. Revindo & Christopher Gan, 2018. "Factors Affecting Variation in SMES' Export Intensity," LPEM FEBUI Working Papers 201820, LPEM, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, revised May 2018.
    5. Armand Djoumessi & Shu-Ling Chen & Stephen Cahoon, 2019. "Deconstructing Lawson And Samson’S Concept Of Innovation Capability: A Critical Assessment And A Refinement," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-31, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:15:y:1987:i:2:p:173-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.