IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v101y2019icp783-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering business model innovation contexts: A comparative analysis by fsQCA methods

Author

Listed:
  • To, Chester K.M.
  • Au, Joe S.C.
  • Kan, C.W.

Abstract

Business model innovation purports to create new business values in uncharted market ecologies. In addressing questions of how business contexts can shape and impose urgency on business model innovation, this research reviews and puts forth five classes of contextual antecedents, namely, business eco-networks, the business actors' behavioral orientation, mastery of technology, rules and governance, and business complexity. The research also posits that the configurations of these contextual antecedents mediate two business model performance outcomes: adaptive agility, and resource capability. This research conceives the antecedents that mediate outcomes in complex multiconfiguration contexts, and analyses their relationships using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) methods. Using data from an empirical survey of 42 innovation start-ups, this research corroboration concludes with relevant implications for managing business model innovation. The research results identify seven antecedent configurations multimorphologically leading to the same outcomes. As uncovered by the analysis, the mastery of technology and business complexity are the most salient, necessary antecedents. This research contributes to the business strategy literature, as well as to innovation management, by characterizing the configurative conditions for the effective pursuit of business model innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • To, Chester K.M. & Au, Joe S.C. & Kan, C.W., 2019. "Uncovering business model innovation contexts: A comparative analysis by fsQCA methods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 783-796.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:783-796
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318306581
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Xingwu & Cao, Dongmei & Tjahjono, Benny & Adegbile, Abiodun, 2022. "Business model innovation themes of emerging market enterprises: Evidence in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1619-1630.
    2. Randhawa, Krithika & Wilden, Ralf & Gudergan, Siegfried, 2021. "How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 618-634.
    3. Negruţiu Cristian & Onea Alexandra & Bădescu Ruxandra, 2020. "Innovation trends in Romanian logistics providers industry," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 807-818, July.
    4. To, Chester K.M. & Chau, K.P. & Kan, Chi Wai, 2020. "The logic of innovative value proposition: A schema for characterizing and predicting business model evolution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 502-520.
    5. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    6. Zhongju Liao & Xiang Zhu, 2022. "A configurational analysis of firms' environmental innovation: Evidence from China's key pollutant‐discharge listed companies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1511-1522, December.
    7. Fernanda Bethlem Tigre & Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado, 2022. "Building trustworthiness: Leadership self-portraits," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3971-3991, December.
    8. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.
    9. Vatankhah, Sanaz & Bamshad, Vahideh & Altinay, Levent & De Vita, Glauco, 2023. "Understanding business model development through the lens of complexity theory: Enablers and barriers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    10. Laura Carraresi & Stefanie Bröring, 2021. "How does business model redesign foster resilience in emerging circular value chains?," Post-Print hal-03267359, HAL.
    11. Tykkyläinen, Saila & Ritala, Paavo, 2021. "Business model innovation in social enterprises: An activity system perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 684-697.
    12. Lalicic, Lidija & Weismayer, Christian, 2021. "Consumers’ reasons and perceived value co-creation of using artificial intelligence-enabled travel service agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 891-901.
    13. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Moffett, Sandra, 2021. "Mission or margin? Using dynamic capabilities to manage tensions in social purpose organisations’ business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 643-657.
    14. Chamindika Weerakoon & Sarath S. Kodithuwakku, 2023. "Configurations of Business Model Innovation: Unpacking the Practice Adopted by Firms in an Emerging Market Context," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(1), pages 218-259, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:783-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.