IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jappol/v29yi4p311-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditional accounting conservatism and future negative surprises: An empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Bong Hwan
  • Pevzner, Mikhail

Abstract

We investigate whether conditional accounting conservatism has informational benefits to shareholders. We find some evidence that higher current conditional conservatism is associated with lower probability of future bad news, proxied by missing analyst forecasts, earnings decreases, and dividend decreases. Second, we find weak evidence that the stock market reacts stronger (weaker) to good (bad) earnings news of more conditionally conservative firms. Thus, we provide additional evidence that conditional conservatism affects stock prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Bong Hwan & Pevzner, Mikhail, 2010. "Conditional accounting conservatism and future negative surprises: An empirical investigation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 311-329, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:29:y::i:4:p:311-329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278-4254(10)00019-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Cui & Pamela Kent & Sujin Kim & Shan Li, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and firm performance during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5543-5579, December.
    2. Simon Ho & Annie Li & Kinsun Tam & Feida Zhang, 2015. "CEO Gender, Ethical Leadership, and Accounting Conservatism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 351-370, March.
    3. Carlo D'Augusta & Matthew D. DeAngelis, 2020. "Does Accounting Conservatism Discipline Qualitative Disclosure? Evidence From Tone Management in the MD&A," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2287-2318, December.
    4. Zhang, Xinyue & Zhong, Yuxiang & Li, Wanli, 2022. "The effect of borrowers' accounting conservatism on lenders' loan loss provisions: Evidence from China's banking industry," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. He Xiao & Jianqun Xi, 2021. "The impact of COVID‐19 on seasoned equity offering: Evidence from China," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 539-572, October.
    6. Lin, Z. Jun & Tian, Zhimin, 2012. "Accounting conservatism and IPO underpricing: China evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 127-144.
    7. Paul Brockman & Tao Ma & Jianfang Ye, 2015. "CEO Compensation Risk and Timely Loss Recognition," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1-2), pages 204-236, January.
    8. Sung Kwon & Jennifer Yin, 2015. "A comparison of earnings persistence in high-tech and non-high-tech firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 645-668, May.
    9. Taewoo Kim & Hyuk Shawn, 2022. "Conservative Financial Reporting and Resilience to the Financial Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Mingjun Zhou, 2012. "Value Relevance Of Book And Tax Income: A Macroeconomic Conditions Perspective," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(2), pages 1-12.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:29:y::i:4:p:311-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jaccpubpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.