IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jappol/v28y2009i5p369-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit and non-audit fees and capital market perceptions of auditor independence

Author

Listed:
  • Ghosh, Aloke (Al)
  • Kallapur, Sanjay
  • Moon, Doocheol

Abstract

This study provides evidence on whether auditor independence-in-appearance, proxied by earnings response coefficients, is related to the non-audit fee ratio (non-audit to total fees from a client) or client importance (total fees from a client as a percentage of the total revenues of the audit firm). The results from large samples over the period 2001-2006 show, contrary to popular belief and the findings of some prior studies, that there is no evidence of a relation between perceived auditor independence and the non-audit fee ratio. However, perceived auditor independence is negatively associated with client importance, consistent with the economic theory of auditing. Our paper adds to the literature by examining the relative importance of non-audit fee ratios and client importance as determinants of independence-in-appearance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghosh, Aloke (Al) & Kallapur, Sanjay & Moon, Doocheol, 2009. "Audit and non-audit fees and capital market perceptions of auditor independence," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 369-385, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:28:y:2009:i:5:p:369-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278-4254(09)00050-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharad Asthana & Rachana Kalelkar, 0. "Impact of economic policy uncertainty on disclosure and pricing of earnings news," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-32.
    2. Sharad Asthana, 2013. "Diversification By The Audit Office And Its Impact On Audit Quality," Working Papers 0152acc, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    3. Guiral, Andrés & Ruiz, Emiliano & Choi, Hyun Jung, 2014. "Audit report information content and the provision of non-audit services: Evidence from Spanish lending decisions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 44-57.
    4. Chen, Lihong & Xiao, Tingting & Zhou, Jia, 2023. "Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Chen, Anthony & Duong, Hong & Ngo, Anh, 2019. "Types of nonaudit service fees and earnings response coefficients in the post-sarbanes-oxley era," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-147.
    6. Giuseppe Ianniello, 2015. "The effects of board and auditor independence on earnings quality: evidence from Italy," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(1), pages 229-253, February.
    7. Sharad Asthana & Rachana Kalelkar, 2023. "Effect of geomagnetic activity on investors and managers: evidence from the pricing and timing of disclosure of earnings news," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 387-413, February.
    8. Sharad Asthana & Rachana Kalelkar, 2020. "Impact of economic policy uncertainty on disclosure and pricing of earnings news," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1481-1512, November.
    9. Hwang, Seokyoun & Sarath, Bharat & Han, Seung-youb, 2022. "Auditor independence: The effect of auditors’ quality control efforts and corporate governance," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Ayesha Hameed & Mazhar Ali Alyani & Muhammad Sijawal Alyani & Ghulam Hussain & Abdul Manan Channa, 2024. "Various Factor Affecting External and Internal Auditor Performance: Analytical Perspectives of Employees Working in Karachi Audit Firm and Companies," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 848-856.
    11. Domenico Campa & Ray Donnelly, 2016. "Non-audit services provided to audit clients, independence of mind and independence in appearance: latest evidence from large UK listed companies," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 422-449, June.
    12. Maman Tachiwou Aboudou & Essonam Magnangou, 2020. "The independence of the auditor as a determinant of the quality of financial information: a perception by listeners of the Togolese context [L’indépendance de l’auditeur comme déterminant de la qua," Post-Print halshs-03029792, HAL.
    13. Seyed Mahmoud Hosseinniakani & Helena Inacio & Rui Mota, 2014. "A Review on Audit Quality Factors," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 243-254, April.
    14. Bugeja, Martin, 2011. "Takeover premiums and the perception of auditor independence and reputation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 278-293.
    15. Yu (Elli) Zhang & David Hay & Claus Holm, 2016. "Non-audit services and auditor independence: Norwegian evidence," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1215223-121, December.
    16. Zhang, Xiaoxiang & Wen, Jie, 2016. "The impacts of economic importance difference of a joint venture (JV) held by partners and partners' size difference on the extraction of rivalrous and non-rivalrous private benefits in a JV," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 46-54.
    17. Alhababsah, Salem & Alhaj-Ismail, Alaa, 2023. "Does shared tenure between audit committee chair and engagement partner affect audit outcomes? Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:28:y:2009:i:5:p:369-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jaccpubpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.