IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jappol/v16y1997i4p415-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation of independent audit opinions and subsequent independent auditor litigation of publicly-traded failed savings and loans

Author

Listed:
  • Blacconiere, Walter G.
  • DeFond, Mark L.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Blacconiere, Walter G. & DeFond, Mark L., 1997. "An investigation of independent audit opinions and subsequent independent auditor litigation of publicly-traded failed savings and loans," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 415-454.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:16:y:1997:i:4:p:415-454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278-4254(96)00042-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abderraouf Abelaziz & Hanen Moalla, 2010. "Les Déterminants De L'Opinion D'Audit Avec Réserve : Une Analyse Empirique En Tunisie," Post-Print hal-00481093, HAL.
    2. Katsuhiko Muramiya & Tomomi Takada, 2010. "Auditor Conservatism, Abnormal Accruals, and Going Concern Opinions," Discussion Papers 2010-64, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    3. Nobert Osemeke & Louis Osemeke, 2017. "The role of auditors in the context of Nigerian environment," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 299-317, November.
    4. Ionel Jianu & Iulia Jianu, 2018. "The Share Price and Investment: Current Footprints for Future Oil and Gas Industry Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Stephan A. Fafatas, 2010. "Auditor conservatism following audit failures," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(7), pages 639-658, July.
    6. Yu, Chun-Chan & Huang, Hua-Wei & Yang, Ya-Chih & Xie, Anxuan, 2022. "Do over-conservative going concern audit opinions exist? Evidence from the prediction model approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Linda Myers & Jaime Schmidt & Michael Wilkins, 2014. "An investigation of recent changes in going concern reporting decisions among Big N and non-Big N auditors," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 155-172, July.
    8. Chrysovalantis Gaganis & Fotios Pasiouras & Charalambos Spathis, 2013. "Regulations and Audit Opinions: Evidence from EU Banking Institutions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 41(3), pages 387-405, March.
    9. Amani, Farzaneh A. & Fadlalla, Adam M., 2017. "Data mining applications in accounting: A review of the literature and organizing framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 32-58.
    10. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jappol:v:16:y:1997:i:4:p:415-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jaccpubpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.