IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfor/v41y2025i2p517-531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive reflection, arithmetic ability and financial literacy independently predict both inflation expectations and forecast accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Comerford, David A.

Abstract

Cognitive reflection is defined as the tendency to detect and check intuitive errors and has been found to predict forecast accuracy in a range of domains. The current research demonstrates in a purpose-designed survey that a question in the Survey of Consumer Expectations serves as a test of cognitive reflection. Using this measure, I demonstrate for the first time in a time-series of inflation expectations that cognitive reflection is associated with greater forecast accuracy. I then apply this insight to interrogate the spike in inflation expectations that occurred over the year 2021. The data rule out that the spike was driven by respondents low in cognitive reflection, who are most vulnerable to overreacting to recent news. These results are insightful for the use of survey data not only in forecasting inflation but in forecasting more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • Comerford, David A., 2025. "Cognitive reflection, arithmetic ability and financial literacy independently predict both inflation expectations and forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 517-531.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:2:p:517-531
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.06.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207024000657
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.06.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:2:p:517-531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijforecast .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.