IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfor/v41y2025i1p3-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning for satisficing operational decision making: A case study in blood supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Abolghasemi, Mahdi
  • Abbasi, Babak
  • HosseiniFard, Zahra

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has attracted recent attention in solving constrained optimization problems to reduce computational time. In this article, we employ multi-output ML models including light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to predict the solution to a constrained optimization problem, explore the impacts of selecting different loss functions, and evaluate their performance by looking at the utility of predicted decisions, i.e., the associated cost components and the feasibility of predicted solutions We implement our approach in a blood supply chain where hospitals collaborate on transshipment to meet demand. We use demand distributions fitted to real data to evaluate the performance of the predictive models by analysis of the utility of forecasts, including total cost, inventory holding, transshipment, outdated unit, and shortage costs associated with predicted decisions. The results of our case study show that an LGBM model with the mean absolute deviation loss function provides solutions with only 2% higher total cost than a stochastic optimization model. Compared to an empirical policy, it could reduce transshipment and shortage costs by 23% and 6%, respectively. Therefore, altering the loss function of ML models can provide appropriate solutions to optimization problems, and various loss functions should be probed accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Abolghasemi, Mahdi & Abbasi, Babak & HosseiniFard, Zahra, 2025. "Machine learning for satisficing operational decision making: A case study in blood supply chain," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 3-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:3-19
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.05.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207023000481
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.05.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:3-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijforecast .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.