IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v48y2019icp72-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the formation mechanism of high-quality knowledge in social question and answer communities: A knowledge co-creation perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yan
  • Zhang, Mingli
  • Luo, Nuan
  • Wang, Yu
  • Niu, Tao

Abstract

The social question and answer (Q&A) community provides people with an effective tool to obtain high-quality information. From the perspective of reciprocal determinism and value co-creation, this study aims to investigate the formation mechanism of high-quality knowledge in the community. We develop a model to investigate how cognitive factors and community technological factors influence users’ knowledge co-creation behavior, thereby influencing knowledge quality in the community. A survey of 382 knowledge contributors in a social Q&A community shows that knowledge self-efficacy, topic richness, personalized recommendation, and social interactivity have a positive impact on users' knowledge sharing and integration behavior, which subsequently affect the community’s knowledge quality. Moreover, users' ratings moderate the influence of knowledge sharing on knowledge quality. This research demonstrates the synergistic effect of people and technology in knowledge co-creation, thus advances literature about value co-creation and content quality in online communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yan & Zhang, Mingli & Luo, Nuan & Wang, Yu & Niu, Tao, 2019. "Understanding the formation mechanism of high-quality knowledge in social question and answer communities: A knowledge co-creation perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 72-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:48:y:2019:i:c:p:72-84
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401218307199
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Liang & Ming Li & Jie Wang & Yating Ma, 2023. "The Influencing Factors of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Q&As," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Dabija, Dan-Cristian & Brătianu, Constantin & Dominici, Gandolfo & Vătămănescu, Elena-Mădălina, 2024. "Unveiling e-learning and knowledge sharing during the pandemic: From expert skills perception to student satisfaction," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Wang, Qingtao & Bai, Xuan & Li, Julie Juan, 2023. "Achieving value co-creation through cooperation in international joint ventures: A two-level perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    4. Natalia Marulanda-Grisales & José Julián Herrera-Pulgarín & María Lucelly Urrego-Marín, 2024. "Knowledge Management Practices as an Opportunity for the Achievement of Sustainable Development in Social Enterprises of Medellín (Colombia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Hu, Qian & Pan, Zhao, 2023. "Can AI benefit individual resilience? The mediation roles of AI routinization and infusion," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Qingfeng Zeng & Wei Zhuang & Qian Guo & Weiguo Fan, 2022. "What factors influence grassroots knowledge supplier performance in online knowledge platforms? Evidence from a paid Q&A service," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2507-2523, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:48:y:2019:i:c:p:72-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.