IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v35y2015i5p551-560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives

Author

Listed:
  • Vilar, Polona
  • Šauperl, Alenka

Abstract

User studies are a rather neglected field in the archival area. This is becoming problematic, as more and more archives are developing online services and collections, becoming available to wider public. We can assume that this transformation will affect archival practice, much like in libraries, and require more knowledge of users’ needs, behavior, and skills. It is unclear how much archivists are aware of these developments. This is particularly the case in those countries where archives have only recently started to consider digitization and online presence and where no user studies have yet been made, like Slovenia (SLO) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH), the focus of this study. A qualitative study is presented which deals with the archivists’ perceptions, within the context of physical and digital archives, of the characteristics of the users, archivists’ educational opportunities regarding user-related issues, and competences needed by professional archivists and by users. Data were collected with interviews and surveys. The results enable an initial insight into archival user types and their characteristics, and the formation of a competence model for a professional archivist. The results have implications for archival theory, practice and education and can also be used in planning future archival user studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilar, Polona & Šauperl, Alenka, 2015. "Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 551-560.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:35:y:2015:i:5:p:551-560
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401215000572
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elaine G. Toms & Wendy Duff, 2002. "“I spent 1 ½ hours sifting through one large box. …”: Diaries as information behavior of the archives user: Lessons learned," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(14), pages 1232-1238, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate Lewis & Frank Sligo & Claire Massey, 2005. "Observe, record, then beyond: Facilitating participant reflection via research diaries," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 216-229, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:35:y:2015:i:5:p:551-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.