IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v30y2010i6p567-572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative risk method for information security management practices: A case context within Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Ozkan, Sevgi
  • Karabacak, Bilge

Abstract

In this case study, a collaborative risk method for information security management has been analyzed considering the common problems encountered during the implementation of ISO standards in eight Turkish public organizations. This proposed risk method has been applied within different public organizations and it has been demonstrated to be effective and problem-free. The fundamental issue is that there is no legislation that regulates the information security liabilities of the public organizations in Turkey. The findings and lessons learned presented in this case provide useful insights for practitioners when implementing information security management projects in other international public sector organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozkan, Sevgi & Karabacak, Bilge, 2010. "Collaborative risk method for information security management practices: A case context within Turkey," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 567-572.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:30:y:2010:i:6:p:567-572
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401210001222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haqaf, Husam & Koyuncu, Murat, 2018. "Understanding key skills for information security managers," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 165-172.
    2. Silva, Maisa Mendonça & de Gusmão, Ana Paula Henriques & Poleto, Thiago & Silva, Lúcio Camara e & Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas, 2014. "A multidimensional approach to information security risk management using FMEA and fuzzy theory," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 733-740.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:30:y:2010:i:6:p:567-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.