IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ingrde/v4y2025i2s2949753125000244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geoeconomic fragmentation: What is at stake for energy transition in the Global North? Empirical evidence from panel-quantile-type estimation methods

Author

Listed:
  • Olasehinde-Williams, Godwin
  • Köksal, Cihat

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of geoeconomic fragmentation on the energy transition in the Global North, a region historically responsible for high greenhouse gas emissions yet crucial in addressing climate change. Recent policy shifts away from economic integration have raised concerns about the risks of geoeconomic fragmentation in climate policy discussions. Using panel quantile methods, the study analyzes how trade restrictions and other factors influence renewable energy consumption across 23 Global North countries from 1990 to 2020. The results show a dual effect: at lower to middle levels of renewable energy consumption, geoeconomic fragmentation positively influences energy transition. However, at higher levels, its impact turns negative, emphasizing the importance of economic integration and reduced trade barriers. These findings suggest that policies should be tailored to specific national conditions to balance geoeconomic shifts with sustainable energy goals. Ultimately, this research highlights the complex relationship between economic fragmentation and energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Olasehinde-Williams, Godwin & Köksal, Cihat, 2025. "Geoeconomic fragmentation: What is at stake for energy transition in the Global North? Empirical evidence from panel-quantile-type estimation methods," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:4:y:2025:i:2:s2949753125000244
    DOI: 10.1016/j.igd.2025.100227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000244
    Download Restriction: Open-access
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:4:y:2025:i:2:s2949753125000244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/innovation-and-green-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.