IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ingrde/v4y2025i2s2949753125000190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated analysis of greenhush

Author

Listed:
  • Hilton, Joshua

Abstract

Greenhushing, the strategic under-reporting of sustainability initiatives by corporations, is a recent phenomenon that challenges traditional assumptions about corporate sustainability communication. Through a systematic analysis of existing literature and the application of institutional theory, this paper develops an integrated theoretical framework to explain the causes of greenhush. Drawing on a combination of qualitative case studies and empirical evidence from multiple industries, the research reveals that greenhush emerges as a strategic response to institutional complexity, particularly when firms face competing stakeholder demands and regulatory uncertainty. The paper makes three key contributions: First, it surveys the recent literature and explore the implications of greenhush for corporate sustainability progress, stakeholder relations, and policy development. Second, it develops a multi-level theoretical framework integrating insights from institutional theory, stakeholder theory, and behavioral economics to explain why and how firms greenhush. Third, it provides suggestions for managers and stakeholders about how to avoid or reverse this decoupling, and align communication with action. These findings have important implications for understanding how organizations navigate institutional pressures while maintaining legitimacy in complex institutional environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilton, Joshua, 2025. "An integrated analysis of greenhush," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:4:y:2025:i:2:s2949753125000190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.igd.2025.100222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000190
    Download Restriction: Open-access

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:4:y:2025:i:2:s2949753125000190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/innovation-and-green-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.