IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ingrde/v3y2024i4s2949753124000535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ESG rating events, party leadership, and green innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xiaoyi
  • Gualberto, Magdaraog

Abstract

Under the dual-carbon goal, societal focus has shifted to corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating outcomes and their role in sustainability. China’ s ESG sector is nascent, with sparse research on the links between ESG ratings, CPC organizational governance, and green innovation. This research utilizes a dataset of all A-share state-owned listed firms between 2010 and 2020 to examine the effect of activities for ESG rating outcomes on green innovation. Additionally, it examines the moderating effect of CPC organizational governance. Our findings suggest that ESG ratings act as an impetus for enterprises to engage in green innovation, with CPC organizational governance playing a supportive role in this dynamic. We adopt several methods to address endogeneity concerns and find our results robust. Furthermore, we note the beneficial impacts of ESG rating outcomes on green innovation activities are directly related to a firm's performance pressure and a low level of marketization. Finally, we find that corporate ESG performance, compared to strategic green innovation, will encourage substantive green innovation. The research guides policy to enhance ESG implementation in Chinese SOEs, underscoring the CPC’ s governance support and the importance of specific actions to optimize environmental gains from ESG activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xiaoyi & Gualberto, Magdaraog, 2024. "ESG rating events, party leadership, and green innovation," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:3:y:2024:i:4:s2949753124000535
    DOI: 10.1016/j.igd.2024.100176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753124000535
    Download Restriction: Open-access
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ingrde:v:3:y:2024:i:4:s2949753124000535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/innovation-and-green-development .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.