IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v14y2013i1p21-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How AIS can progress along with ontology research in IS

Author

Listed:
  • Guan, Jian
  • Levitan, Alan S.
  • Kuhn, John R.

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a strong and growing interest in the computer science (CS) and information systems (IS) disciplines in applying and extending ontological principles to various CS/IS domains such as knowledge representation, natural language processing, conceptual modeling, and IS development. Similar interest and work have also been observed in accounting information systems (AIS) research. Though ontology research in AIS has enjoyed sustained interest and produced some significant results, there is relatively little incorporation of recent developments in CS/IS ontology research into AIS. This paper provides an overview of some leading areas of ontology research in CS/IS and AIS in an attempt to bridge this gap. The main objectives of this paper are to (1) introduce CS/IS ontology research, (2) highlight areas of future research in AIS where CS/IS ontology research developments can be used to address important and pressing issues, and (3) broaden an area of research where AIS can make unique contributions to distinguish itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan, Jian & Levitan, Alan S. & Kuhn, John R., 2013. "How AIS can progress along with ontology research in IS," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 21-38.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:14:y:2013:i:1:p:21-38
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2012.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089512000589
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2012.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutton, Steve G., 2010. "A research discipline with no boundaries: Reflections on 20years of defining AIS research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 289-296.
    2. Belkaoui, A, 1980. "The Interprofessional Linguistic Communication Of Accounting Concepts - An Experiment In Sociolinguistics," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 362-374.
    3. François Bodart & Arvind Patel & Marc Sim & Ron Weber, 2001. "Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 384-405, December.
    4. Oliver, Bl, 1974. "Semantic Differential - Device For Measuring Interprofessional Communication Of Selected Accounting Concepts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 299-316.
    5. Salvatore March & Alan Hevner & Sudha Ram, 2000. "Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 327-341, December.
    6. Quattrone, Paolo & Hopper, Trevor, 2005. "A 'time-space odyssey': management control systems in two multinational organisations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(7-8), pages 735-764.
    7. O'Leary, Daniel E., 2010. "Enterprise ontologies: Review and an activity theory approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 336-352.
    8. Frederico Fonseca, 2007. "The double role of ontologies in information science research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(6), pages 786-793, April.
    9. Alles, Michael G. & Kogan, Alexander & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2008. "Exploiting comparative advantage: A paradigm for value added research in accounting information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 202-215.
    10. F. Gailly & G. Poels, 2007. "Towards Ontology-driven Information Systems: Redesign and Formalization of the REA Ontology," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/445, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    11. Richard O. Mason & Ian I. Mitroff, 1973. "A Program for Research on Management Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 475-487, January.
    12. Zhu, Hongwei & Madnick, Stuart E., 2008. "Semantic Integration Approach to Efficient Business Data Supply Chain: Integration Approach to Interoperable XBRL," Working papers 40087, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    13. Andrew Burton-Jones & Peter N. Meso, 2006. "Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 38-60, March.
    14. Yair Wand & Ron Weber, 2002. "Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling—A Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 363-376, December.
    15. Thomas E. McKee, 2003. "Rough sets bankruptcy prediction models versus auditor signalling rates," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(8), pages 569-586.
    16. Ramayya Krishnan & James Peters & Rema Padman & David Kaplan, 2005. "On Data Reliability Assessment in Accounting Information Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 307-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fábio Albuquerque & Paula Gomes Dos Santos, 2023. "Recent Trends in Accounting and Information System Research: A Literature Review Using Textual Analysis Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Hutchison, Paul D. & Daigle, Ronald J. & George, Benjamin, 2018. "Application of latent semantic analysis in AIS academic research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 83-96.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roman Lukyanenko & Jeffrey Parsons & Yolanda F. Wiersma, 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 669-689, December.
    2. Jan Mendling & Jan Recker & Hajo A. Reijers & Henrik Leopold, 2019. "An Empirical Review of the Connection Between Model Viewer Characteristics and the Comprehension of Conceptual Process Models," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1111-1135, October.
    3. Andrew Burton-Jones & Peter N. Meso, 2006. "Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 38-60, March.
    4. Roman Lukyanenko & Wolfgang Maass & Veda C. Storey, 2022. "Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1993-2020, December.
    5. Alles, Michael, 2020. "Using the 2019 JBE conference and 2017 JIS themed issue as natural experiments to examine the role of editors as gatekeepers of the research literature in AIS and ethics," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    6. G.R. Chesley, 1986. "Interpretation of uncertainty expressions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 179-199, March.
    7. F. Gailly & G. Poels, 2007. "Ontology-driven Business Modelling: Improving the Conceptual Representation of the REA Ontology," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/444, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Rikhardsson, Pall & Yigitbasioglu, Ogan, 2018. "Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 37-58.
    9. Roger Clarke & Andrew Burton-Jones & Ron Weber, 2016. "On the Ontological Quality and Logical Quality of Conceptual-Modeling Grammars: The Need for a Dual Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 365-382, June.
    10. G.R. Chesley, 1986. "Interprétations des expressions d'incertitude," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 200-221, March.
    11. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne & Lymer, Andy, 2012. "The SEC's retail investor 2.0: Interactive data and the rise of calculative accountability," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 183-200.
    12. Alles, Michael, 2018. "Examining the role of the AIS research literature using the natural experiment of the 2018 JIS conference on cloud computing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 58-74.
    13. Palash Bera & Andrew Burton-Jones & Yair Wand, 2014. "Research Note ---How Semantics and Pragmatics Interact in Understanding Conceptual Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 401-419, June.
    14. Barbara Weißenberger & Gero Holthoff, 2013. "Cognitive style and connotative meaning in management accounting communication," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    16. Sohei Ito & Dominik Vymětal & Roman Šperka & Michal Halaška, 2018. "Process mining of a multi-agent business simulator," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 500-531, December.
    17. Pablo de Llano Monelos & Manuel Rodríguez López & Carlos Piñeiro Sánchez, 2013. "Bankruptcy Prediction Models in Galician companies. Application of Parametric Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 117-136.
    18. Ben Roelens & Geert Poels, 2015. "The Development and Experimental Evaluation of a Focused Business Model Representation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(1), pages 61-71, February.
    19. Ewelina Zarzycka, 2012. "Implementation Of An Erp Package And Its Effect On The Management Accounting System – Author’S Own Research Into Enterprises In Poland," "e-Finanse", University of Information Technology and Management, Institute of Financial Research and Analysis, vol. 8(3), pages 85-96, December.
    20. repec:opa:wpaper:0015 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Tony Mortensen & Richard Fisher, 2011. "The meaning of cash in the context of alternative accounting standards," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 23-49, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:14:y:2013:i:1:p:21-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.