IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v34y2025i2s096959312400129x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How institutional voids are experienced and enacted through social innovation initiatives by multinationals in emerging markets

Author

Listed:
  • Matus-Ruiz, Maximino
  • Saka-Helmhout, Ayse
  • Carillo, Jorge

Abstract

This paper explores the role of agency in the social construction of institutional voids, rather than seeing them primarily as given. Drawing on case studies of Microsoft in Juarez, Mexico, and Randstad in Buenos Aires, Argentina, we study the interplay among institutional logics, voids, and social innovation practices to fill the voids. We find that organizational practices embedded in institutional logics can collide with social reality and hamper the attainment of organizational goals (void experience). This prompts MNEs to experiment with novel solutions embedded in distinct logics (void enactment) in alignment with the organization´s identity. By outlining an agentic model of void experience and enactment, we provide a fresh perspective on voids to international business scholars and call attention to the social constructivist roots of institutional theory in studying social innovation by multinationals in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Matus-Ruiz, Maximino & Saka-Helmhout, Ayse & Carillo, Jorge, 2025. "How institutional voids are experienced and enacted through social innovation initiatives by multinationals in emerging markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:2:s096959312400129x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312400129X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:2:s096959312400129x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.