IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v96y2010i1p36-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Opting-in or opting-out?'--The views of the UK's faith leaders in relation to organ donation

Author

Listed:
  • Randhawa, Gurch
  • Brocklehurst, Anna
  • Pateman, Ruth
  • Kinsella, Suzannah
  • Parry, Vivienne

Abstract

Introduction This article reports the findings from the interviews with the main United Kingdom faith and belief leaders which were commissioned by the Organ Donation Taskforce as part of its evidence gathering when exploring the potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation.Methodology 17 interviews were arranged with the main faith and belief organisations within the United Kingdom. Interviews covered a range of issues related to organ donation and opt-in and opt-out.Results The majority of faith and belief leaders are supportive of the opt-in system, and favour retaining it over the introduction of an opt-out system. Whilst the shortcomings of the current system are recognised, the majority felt that there is scope to make improvements without changing legislation.Conclusion In order to achieve better engagement on organ donation with members of faith and belief groups in the future, it will be important to continue the dialogue that has begun with these interviews. It is important not only for the public to be aware of the position of faith and belief leaders, but also just as important for the medical profession and policy makers to recognise that all United Kingdom faith and belief leaders interviewed wish organ donation and transplantation to be a success.

Suggested Citation

  • Randhawa, Gurch & Brocklehurst, Anna & Pateman, Ruth & Kinsella, Suzannah & Parry, Vivienne, 2010. "'Opting-in or opting-out?'--The views of the UK's faith leaders in relation to organ donation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 36-44, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:1:p:36-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(09)00336-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayward, Clare & Madill, Anna, 2003. "The meanings of organ donation: Muslims of Pakistani origin and white English nationals living in North England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 389-401, August.
    2. Exley, Catherine & Sim, Julius & Reid, Norma & Jackson, Simon & West, Nick, 1996. "Attitudes and beliefs within the Sikh community regarding organ donation: A pilot study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 23-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morgan, Myfanwy & Mayblin, Maya & Jones, Roger, 2008. "Ethnicity and registration as a kidney donor: The significance of identity and belonging," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 147-158, January.
    2. Donal McGlade & Carol McClenahan & Barbara Pierscionek, 2014. "Pro-Donation Behaviours of Nursing Students from the Four Countries of the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    3. Dasgupta, Kushan, 2018. "Generosity and compliance: Recruitment-work and the pathways to participation in bone marrow donation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 86-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:96:y:2010:i:1:p:36-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.